You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Saga of Soggy Sauerkraut: Glyphosate = Bad

in #life9 days ago (edited)

Awesome tool! Sadly it neglects to archive the figures, where the data is displayed. I recently read of a way to transform images to text and back, an ancient tool that underlay Usenet.

I tried to use archive.today again and continue to refuse to believe it is gone, even though it wasn't there to archive the site I tried to send it. This looks like a great tool, but accomodation for data, for charts and figures, must be made or much of the value of published science will not be preserved. I deeply appreciate you sharing it with me, as my despair over the destruction of archive.today continued unabated until now.

Thanks!

Edit: Gah! What do I do when it does this?

❌ Content extraction failed: Readability.js could not extract content

Here is the site I tried to ArcHive, in case it makes a difference.

https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/primer_on_the_grand_jury_common_law_natural_law_and_equity_20160712.pdf

Sort:  

Put that feedback on dan's post, he may be able to fix it.
He got burn to work.

Loading...

Yes, for sure let him know, he mentioned in the video that things too long for one post would continue in the comments, but that doesn't appear to be working.

I did. I also mentioned the ArcHive of the paper I linked in the OP did not save the figures, which is of critical import in scientific publishing. I cannot express my gratitude you brought this app to my attention enough, although I probably have, enough for you. LOL

I also pointed out the .pdf I tried to ArcHive failed. Hopefully he can fix these issues and then we'll have a proper archival solution to combat the creepy stalkers purging the webz of truth.

Many of my links have been broken over the years, now I have the @anti-archive.

 8 days ago Reveal Comment