Though, it will be evolving to nod in agreement at other's opinions of what may or may not be considered vote buying.

I don't understand this sentence xD

Define AI produced, if it's fully generated by AI and author just read through with slight changes then should absolutely not be rewarded. If used AI to fix spelling/grammar/readiness and openly mentioned it's okay-ish, although personally I'd prefer to read the raw.

There's a fine-line there, I think there's some people abusing autovotes to generate AI generated content, usually about things that many have already blogged and posted about countless times that the AI know already. There may even be some pretending to just use AI for the grammar/etc as an excuse to just have it generate the full post with very low effort - guess it comes down to how much you wanna believe the person. It's difficult times ahead for curators even without all these schemes people come up with.