VI: Bladder caner causes are pretty well established, and historically, there has never been a credible link between vaccines and bladder cancer. So the only thing this case has going for it is the coincidental timing. But it's not enough to be credible reporting.
You can´t compare with a classical vax, this is mRNA in nanoparticles, made for transfecting cells, we are speaking about an active gene therapy, such a genomic integration was already decomunted in cells,
https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/21/e2105968118.full.pdf
To call this coincidence is simply denying facts.
For the 31-yo case, no. Because the report was very weak, biased, and not independent.
For the study you've shared, Yes, genomic integration of a fragmented RNA was done invitro. But from what I understand, it is much less likely to occur in a living human.
Until the 20bp fragment was found in a cancer patient. But anyway, it won´t be the last incidence. Time will tell who is right. Because many cancers did occur after the modRNA-"vaccination".
I agree that time will tell... I support all peer reviewed and independently verified studies. However, there have also been peer-reviewed studies of mRNA vaccines increasing cancer-fighting chances.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0f22/3dabe67d4249565fcebfe13579558a712822.pdf
Yes, those are specific ones containing e.g. antisense mRNA to cancer-causing factors, but not toxic proteins.