It's going to take up a few replies cause I'm sure 288 characters won't suffice. But I also want to preface this by saying: I totally support independent investigations and scrutiny of the Covid vaccines. His specific case, however, is very lacking. Here is why:
II. There was no independent investigation or extensive study of this case. Nor has there been a follow up since this 'case' was first published.
III. No sufficient patient data is available. No name, hospital, pathology report, medical record, or independent clinical verification is provided. No pre-vaccination health history, genetic predisposition, occupational or environmental factors are disclosed.
IV: Human genome contains ~3-billion bp (base pairs).
A 20 bp match inside a 3-billion bp is insignificant. You can match 20 bp between a human and a mouse, or a plant, or a bacteria.
True, the level of evidence is not that of a RCT, but not true that a specific 20bp sequence is insignificant, it´s p is less than 0,002 per genome. You really think it is a coincidence that that sequence appears after mRNA vaccination and cancer?
I'm not a biologist by any means. But from what I understand, 20bp match is very common throughout the genome. So it needs to be way bigger to demonstrate a link between vaccine and tumor. (In addition to the fact that they never sequenced the tumor).
For there to be credible evidence of matching (for genomic integration), there has to be 30 bp and above. And for there to be strong evidence of link, it has to be over 100 bp match. (ChatGPT has spoken 😌).
V: I'm not sure why, but the report also states that they sequenced DNA from the patient's blood and urine, but not the tumor itself. This is actually one of the biggest scientific problems with the claim - never demonstrated a clear connection between the vaccine and the tumor.